|
Packetising
voice
|
December
2001
While many forward-looking enterprises have already integrated
their voice and data networks, it is only now that signs are
emerging of convergence within wide-area systems
|
|
If the Internet
is helping to nourish the commercial survival of a multitude of
businesses today, then IP (Internet Protocol) is an essential vitamin.
IP is the global, de facto standard for the Internet, which provides
each device or server connected to the network with a unique number.
This 'IP address' is critical, as it is used to pinpoint where on
the network devices send and receive data.
IP also plays a crucial role in the ongoing process of convergence,
under which computers, telephones and consumer electronics devices
- for example, television sets - are increasingly able to exchange
data with one another through a unified network.
As a result of the pervasive influence of IP, established standards
designed for narrow instances of network use are inevitably giving
way to IP. Many firms now use IP across their own local networks,
rather than dedicated network protocols, for example, to identify
PCs and other networked devices like printers with IP addresses.
In this way, these private networks can more easily be integrated
with, so-called, public networks, larger-scale systems made available
to a wide customer base by service providers and other carriers.
Convergence
Until recently,
however, the rapid growth of the Internet, and its integration with
the functions of local networks, had run in parallel to the use
of PSTN (public switched telephone network) systems for voice-based
communication.
Although PSTNs are capable of managing data-based traffic, such
as faxes or modem-based Internet connections, they are fundamentally
ill-equipped for data - as a dedicated circuit needs to be established
between two points, which is both expensive and is waste of valuable
bandwidth.

IP telephones
combine voice and data |
While
consumers and small businesses - with minimal data transmission
requirements - are prepared to accept PSTNs' data facilities
and use their PSTN phone socket as a route for all their communication,
SME and corporate customers have steadfastly maintained two
separate networks throughout their operations, in order to
strike a practical balance between quality of service (QoS)
and cost for their voice and data traffic.
|
top
This separation could be coming to an end, however, through the
use of IP telephony systems that enable data networks to treat voice
traffic as just another form of data. A defining characteristic
of a PSTN voice or data transmission is that it relies on circuit-committed
switching methods, where a set, and exclusive route is established
for the duration of the connection.
Conversely, IP networks use packet-switching techniques, where data
is separated into 'packets' that can each travel a different path,
and then be reassembled at the destination. With IP telephony, voice
calls are also broken into packets and travel through a network
alongside other data formats.
Voice-over-IP or VoIP has become a generic term for the use of IP
telephony, although it is technically a specific standard - ITU-T
H.323 - promoted by the VoIP Forum, including Cisco, 3Com, Netspeak
and others, as the best technology for sending audio and video over
IP-based networks. Although VoIP currently provides poorer call
quality than conventional voice networks, it does carry clear benefits,
says Nortel Networks' IP telephony marketing manager Gavin McFadyen.
"It can't be touched in terms of low cost of implementation."
top
Carrier reluctance
Data formats, such as fax or Internet, have been relayed over public
circuit-switched networks for many years. Enabling PSTN networks
to use packet-switching, however, requires modification of every
controlling switch in the network.
Up until now, therefore, carrier investment in VoIP has largely
been confined to new infrastructure, particularly from start-up
carriers that are building networks from scratch. The long-established
telecom giants like BT and Deutsche Telecom have decades' worth
of PSTN investment that will require significant upgrades to support
packet voice transfer.
So, while some incumbents embrace IP as they enter new markets -
McFadyen points to BT's IP-based network in Spain - they have been
reluctant to embark on the large-scale domestic projects that changing
from PSTN to IP demands.
But that resistance cannot hold, claims McFadyen, who sees signs
that the old guard is starting to embrace the new realities. "The
older companies are starting to risk looking like dinosaurs next
to the alternative carriers," he says.
"Now we're seeing established carriers saying: 'Let's get IP
telephony ourselves,'" he says. Nortel, itself, recently signed
a deal with Sprint, the US-based international telecoms operator
to supply the equipment it needs to begin converting its entire
network to handle VoIP. The deal covers the first four-year phase
and affects approximately 3.6 million telephone lines.
top
Big business
A recent report from research group Frost & Sullivan estimates
that as more carriers accept the need to convert legacy networks,
75 per cent of global voice traffic will travel over the Internet
by 2007. McFadyen believes that even this figure could be conservative:
"The levels of use are certainly low at the moment, but once
carriers change their switches to IP, you have 50 million or 100
million people moving to IP in one go. It could potentially happen
very quickly when it does."
As more established carriers join the alternative service providers
already using IP networks, seamless interaction between networks
will become crucial. One solution is the 'Telia Clearing House',
from the Swedish network Telia.
This offers service providers a means to direct calls that start
and terminate on PSTN systems through Telia's own IP network, enabling
the carrier to offer low-cost communications packages to customers
not yet converted to IP. Clearing House is able to track the call
and make payments to each operator that handles part of the call
transfer. Telia is initially looking to Eastern Europe as a key
marketplace for the system, as the lower quality of PSTN in the
region means switching to VoIP, as it stands now, is less jarring.
Inside the
enterprise
|
While
many incumbent telecom operators continue to weigh up the
pros and cons of moving the mass of their customers onto IP
voice networks, more nimble carriers are
already targeting the lucrative enterprise
market
- which threatens to erode the incumbent's already precarious
position.
|

VoIP is easy
to integrate |
At the most
basic level, an enterprise is able to route its calls through a
VoIP-enabled gateway server that sends calls through the firm's
Internet service provider, rather than its telecoms carrier, making
the calls much cheaper. However, this is far from straightforward.
The key to an effective corporate voice network is not bandwidth
in itself - "even ten megabits a second is a lot when it comes
to voice," says Nortel's McFadyen - but management of data
traffic. "A well thought-out system allows the network to give
priority to voice over other types of traffic," he says.
top
Despite this additional layer of complexity, many firms choosing
to integrate their communications typically regard the need to upgrade
as an opportunity rather than an expense. "If people have a
lot of digital phones, they add a gateway to their present system,
but if they have an old PBX switchboard, customers are, by and large,
upgrading their switches. We're seeing a lot of firms upgrading
to Gigabit Ethernet. We don't see questions about achieving effective
voice compression coming up anymore."
Using IP for all communications also enables firms to deploy advanced
forms of computer and telephony integration. Replacing existing
telephone handsets with new, IP-based handsets allows for greater
operational flexibility, says McFadyen.
"You do see a difference when you start to deploy applications
in parallel, from fairly simple applications like 'hot desking'
through to unified messaging." Staff can route faxes, emails
and voice calls through the same equipment, enabling them to share
directory information, or have their equipment bring up a customer
record automatically by recognising the caller's phone number.
An alternative to IP handsets is to provide staff with digital headsets
that plug into their PCs, with software packages providing an on-screen
'softphone'. "The software is H.323 compatible to allow applications
like video conferencing, whiteboarding and file sharing," says
McFadyen. Because achieving clean-sounding audio through staff PCs
may not have been a priority when ordering equipment originally,
a USB-based headset adaptor can process the voice traffic offline.
McFadyen adds that enterprises' willingness to invest in high-bandwidth
networks as they convert to VoIP is enabling operators to provide
enhanced voice services. "The increase in bandwidth is going
to impact telephony - perhaps in the very near future. We're looking
at developing stereo sound, for instance."
Domestic
use
The significant remaining sector of the market, so far untroubled
by any consideration of IP telephony, is the family home. The growing
momentum behind telecoms carriers upgrading their networks is only
part of the equation here, says McFadyen.
"It all comes down to terminals. For the consumer, replacing
an analogue phone with an IP telephone doesn't have a lot of potential.
The thing that might change this is 3G, and its use of video and
location-based services: it's possible that you'll see operators
trying to move people towards using wireless terminals exclusively."
top
|