| Market
signals
June/July
2002
While it has
been easy to become distracted by the World Cup finals in recent
weeks, few of you in the UK will have failed to notice that at the
moment - alongside the traditional mix of increasingly esoteric
commercials - the British public is being bombarded with adverts
for ‘broadband’ and GPRS-enabled mobile telephone services.
While it is obviously impossible to judge how successful the ‘conversion
rates’ of these commercials are in our capacity as mere observers,
there is no doubt that for the first time operators are attempting
to tap into the collective conscience of the mass market.
Does this mean that - for reasons known only to the marketing machines
of the various providers - that there has been a ‘paradigm
shift’ in the public’s attitude to new technology? No,
it simply means that after two years of talking up the technology,
the operators are now logistically able to provide it to significant
numbers. Could you really judge the success of a new mass-market
product without an accompanying mass-market advertising campaign?
Exactly. Thus, in some quarters, broadband’s obituary has
been published far too soon.
Nevertheless, some parts of the broadband industry have gone badly
wrong. Witness the collapse of yet another pan-European broadband
backbone provider KPNQwest. Great idea, but just another business
built on mere speculation rather than on hard and realistic demand
projections.
Moreover, while the mass market may at last be able to benefit from
reasonably priced and smartly provisioned broadband access, it may
do the exact opposite for the wider broadband industry. Ironically,
it is those same companies - whose dominance broadband provision
by new players was supposed to challenge - that appear poised to
monopolise this rich new revenue stream.
But from a customer point of view, why should you care where your
broadband service comes from? Simply, because you are likely to
get a cheaper and better service from a provider which operates
in a competitive market. Therefore, until the fundamental competitive
issues at the heart of the industry are solved, we must temper our
newly-found broadband enthusiasm with an element of concern.
On an administrative note, the more observant among you will have
also noticed that the magazine is later than usual. This is because
from this issue onwards Broadband will change from a monthly to
a bi-monthly title. This will give us the time to provide you with
an even richer mix of news, analysis and comment and enable us to
do proper justice to the exciting developments that are now beginning
to occur throughout the industry.
|