|
How
the mighty fall
October
2001
While undoubtedly sad, the demise of Excite@Home has been anticipated
for some time. When Patti Hart, the former sales executive of
US long distance carrier, Sprint, was revealed as chairman and
CEO of the company – with a supporting cast of TV engineers
and AT&T lifers – the comedy of errors had already begun |
|
| |
|
So what exactly
could have gone so badly wrong, so quickly? Can the blame be laid
squarely at the feet of an inept management team with an over bureaucratic
support network. Well, not entirely, but they must shoulder the
lion’s share of the blame.
Excite@Home
is simply a victim of hype over reality. While senior management
may be able to bamboozle credulous investors with their talk of
‘synergy’ and ‘leveraged potential’, unfortunately, such talk only
has a half-life of about five years – after which the really incisive
questions begin.
Sinking
ship
For Excite@Home,
the writing was on the wall as far back as the middle of 2000.
At that time, George Bell, former chairman and CEO of the company
entered into a brash strategic alliance with Mark Schneider, CEO
of UPC to merge the two companies’ international operations into
what was to be called ‘Excite Chello’.
Unfortunately,
before the new relationship could be commercially consumated, it
all sadly unravelled as it emerged the UPC couldn’t keep its side
of the deal. Without an international market to offset slowing US
demand, Excite@Home was beginning to look perilously vulnerable.
However, Hart put on a brave face and blamed the weakening Internet
advertising environment. "While it is disappointing that market
conditions make it necessary to discontinue certain European businesses,
it is important for us to continue to focus more closely on our
strengths," she said. "We remain optimistic regarding the growth
prospects for Excite UK and Excite Italia, and we will continue
to concentrate on delivering value to our shareholders."
Even as recently
as March 2001, Excite UK claimed to have made a small net profit
for the quarter. However, the competition was fiercest outside the
UK. Europe had the big hitters and Excite was being squeezed out
of the picture.
With the loss of confidence from Comcast and Cox Communications,
Excite's cable backers, the cost base could not fall fast enough
in the dying weeks of the dotcom bubble. Despite the recent sale
of Excite's Australian assets to Optus, Excite@Home’s business plan
had been irrevocably breached and even this firesale was not enough
to prevent the company from having to seek Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection, and the current AT&T asset strip.
top
Spoils
With regard
to the break-up of Excite@Home, of particular interest is the conspicuous
omission of its entire content business, its search engine and its
portal. Only the hardware has been snapped up by AT&T. Where does
this leave the fabled – and increasingly cliched – mantra ‘content
is king’?
Such a move
per se does not necessarily augur too badly for the industry. Arguably,
the last thing AT&T needs just now is to try and shoehorn another
content portfolio into its own front ends. Just consider the problems
it has already experienced attempting to combine BT's Concert assets
into its own corporate multinational services.
Moreover, just
because Excite@Homes’s version of broadband provision failed does
not mean to say that there is no demand. There is plenty.
But, perhaps, what it does cast doubt on is the wisdom of controlling
the content and the delivery networks. In a bull market, such a
policy may pay handsome dividends, but when things start to go wrong,
a company is doubly exposed.
Casualty?
Of course,
the failure of Excite@Home could also possibly be explained by the
forcing together of the wildly different telecoms, cable and content
cultures. The marriage of cable and telecom management cultures
with the more flighty ‘Johnny-come-lately’ mindset of new media
content providers was never going to be a match made in heaven.
Throughout the ages, engineering-based telcos have always made bad
bedfellows with the more commercially focused software and value-added
service providers – but it seems lessons are never learned.
Whatever the
main reason, Excite@Homes’ demise will soon be nothing more than
a footnote in the short history of the twenty-first century’s converging
communications industry. As the spheres of influence in TMT (telecoms
media and technology) collide like tectonic plates from all angles
and directions, it will generate a new communications world order,
all together less sexy and less spontaneous – but, undoubtedly,
more pragmatic and more difficult than one the board of Excite@Home
had imagined.
top
|