|
Bertelsmann
bolsters portfolio
| In
an effort to strengthen its position in this new era of digital
communication and distribution networks, in February 2001, Bertelsmann
announced that it was acquiring an additional 30% of the German
TV, radio and film production company, RTL Group, from Groupe
Bruxelles Lambert (GBL). |
 |
This will give
Bertelsmann 67% of the company and allow it exploit the Group's
rich online assets - something that could prove increasingly valuable
if its embryonic relationship with Napster can weather the legal
storm it has precipitated.
The agreement
between Bertelsmann and GBL - whose stock is majority-owned by private
entrepreneurs Albert Frère and Paul Desmarais - involves a share
swap in which GBL's shares in the RTL Group are to be exchanged
for 25.1% shares in Bertelsmann. While the deal leaves Bertelsmann
the effective owner of RTL Group, 22% of the Group is still owned
by Pearson and the remaining 11% is in free-float. Additionally,
GBL has the option of floating - in whole or in part - its newly
acquired stake in Bertelsmann within four years.
Bertelsmann's
executive board - along with its founder and majority shareholder
Reinhard Mohn - had been planning the acquisition for a number of
months after a supervisory board had concluded that the development
would be a positive step for the company. In an official announcement
by the company it said: 'All parties involved agree that Bertelsmann
has found a ground-breaking new way to adjust to changing conditions
and to use its own shares as acquisition currency, while still retaining
its entrepreneurial independence'.
Bertelsmann
Chairman and CEO Thomas Middelhoff declared: "From both a strategic
and a historic point of view, this is a significant step that will
lastingly shape the company's future. It will strengthen Bertelsmann's
position as the driving force in television, a future growth market.
The RTL Group has a central meaning in Bertelsmann's corporate strategy.
He continued:
"The brand's magnetism can be leveraged and developed for many media
consumer communities throughout the various sectors and product
lines. We have longstanding friendly ties with GBL and welcome them
as a new shareholder. Bertelsmann's unique corporate culture will
remain intact even in the event of a possible IPO in about three
years from now," he said.
Assets
The RTL Group was created in April 2000 through the merger of CLT-UFA
and Pearson TV. It comprises 22 television stations and 18 radio
stations in 11 countries, and is the world's second largest producer
of television movies - second only to Hollywood.
 |
It is also Europe's leading sports rights marketer. The Group
occupies leading positions in three of Europe's six largest
media markets - Germany, France and the Netherlands and reaches
120 million television viewers and radio listeners a day. |
What makes the
RTL Group particularly attractive to Bertelsmann which, among other
media companies stands out as having an entirely progressive attitude
to new media and technology, is the fact that the Group has become
the Internet market leader with 'RTL World' in Germany within just
two years - a position that Bertelsmann is keen to exploit. Among
the sites that comprise RTL World are: RTL.de, RTL.Dating.de, Formel-1.de,
GZSZ.de and RTL-mail.de.
In recent months,
RTL's websites have come to play an increasingly important role
within the wider Group. Management have begun to see that RTL's
online activities offer good opportunities for the cross promotion
of content generated in different parts of the Group.
Didier Bellens,
Chief Executive Officer of the RTL Group said: "Bertelsmann is one
of the driving forces behind the RTL Group's growth. It has provided
support at every stage of our development, with unerring vision
and a distinct strategic interest in our business. Our joint aims
are based on the same principles, our strategies are based on the
same convictions, and our goals, as we shape the media of the future
for our audiences throughout many countries, match perfectly."
Problems
brewing
While
the acquisition of the RTL Group is certainly a positive step for
Bertelsmann, providing a rich seam of additional content and multiple
new routes to market, its recent agreement with the now infamous
Napster is under threat after judiciaries in the US and Europe effectively
ruled the company's service illegal. If the deal is to make anything
other than headlines, Bertelsmann and Napster have to persuade a
highly sceptical media industry that the controversial service can
work in all of their interests.
In early February,
a US appeal court ruled that the Napster service knowingly helped
its users - approximately 50m worldwide - to infringe the copyright
of music owners. The ruling stopped short of shutting the service
down at the time, but Napster admitted that the ruling could effectively
force the company to close - particularly it was forced to pay damages.
Similarly, only
days after the US ruling, the European Parliament also approved
new rules that would make the sharing of copyrighted material via
the Internet illegal without the permission of the owner within
the European Union. The rulings - which take no account of the respective
legal environments within the member states - are scheduled to become
law within 18 months. However, this timetable seems optimistic given
the complexity of the subject and the many appeals and counter appeals
that are sure to follow in its wake.
Even if the
service is forced to close, Bertelsmann and Napster are proceeding
on the basis that they will be able to develop a secure subscription-based
service, which they plan to launch in autumn 2001. However, of some
concern to them must be whether their user-base will be prepared
to pay to use the service and, if they are forced to close in the
meantime, how many of their users will ultimately return?
Full steam
ahead
Despite these rulings - and their possible consequences - the campaign
to win the hearts and minds of a cynical media industry has begun
in earnest. No sooner had the US ruling been passed down, Napster
and Bertelsmann announced that they had developed a technology which
would preserve the copyright's of content owners while, at the same
time, preserve the file sharing nature of the Napster service. This,
they stated, would provide the basis for the commercial service
the companies are developing.
A week later,
in an effort to assuage the anger of other media companies, Napster
unveiled the business plan of the putative new service. The plan
proposes to 'provide Euros 1bn to the major record labels, songwriters
and independent labels over five years. Major labels will receive
Euros 150m per year for a non-exclusive licence, divided according
to files transferred. Euros 50m per year will be set aside for independent
labels and artists, to be paid out based on the volume of transfers'.
The money for
these payments will come from subscriptions: 'Napster is planning
a tiered membership model that includes a basic membership plan
and premium membership plan. Definitive pricing has not been set
yet. However, Napster is looking at a price range of Euros 2.95
to Euros 4.95 per month for the basic membership that would have
a monthly file transfer limit built in. The premium membership,
which would cost between Euros 5.95 and Euros 9.95 per month would
offer unlimited file transfers', says the statement.
In the meantime,
both companies face the up hill struggle of attempting to persuade
other media companies to make their music libraries available to
the new service when it is developed. Yet, even if this proves impossible,
BMG (Bertelsmann Music Group) plans to make its music catalogue
available to the new service, as soon as it becomes a subscription
service and can prove its security. If, and when, this happens,
there is a chance that other media companies may follow suit.
However, the
more likely scenario is that while Napster and Bertelsmann are distracted
by their legal disputes, other media companies will attempt to move
in and establish rival subscription services. Among those already
planning such services are giants AOL Time Warner and Vivendi Universal
together with a number of start-up companies including FullAudio
and Streamwaves.
An academic
point?
While the recent rulings in the US and Europe may represent a victory
over Napster, they fall well short of providing of the music industry
- and other companies whose products can be digitised - with the
definitive answer to the problem of file sharing. There are a multitude
of other file sharing services, like Gnutella, SpinFrenzy and CuteMX,
that offer similar services to Napster. And, significantly for the
media industry, their structures have been designed to make a prosecution
virtually impossible. There is no one index controlled by an entity
that could provide the focal point of an investigation.
Furthermore,
if it were not for people like Napster's Shawn Fanning, Netscape's
Marc Andreessen and other technical 'whizzkids' of their generation,
then the Internet, as we know it today, would probably not exist
at all. Therefore, it is slightly ironic that a pioneer like Napster,
which is arguably raising the profits of the music industry by giving
recording artists a higher profile, should find itself dragged before
the courts by the big music corporations while they simultaneously
develop their own Napster-like services.
The battle between
Napster and the music companies represents more than a dispute about
copyright infringement. It represents a battle between those who
are responsible for making the Internet what it is, and those who
want to control and commercialise it. It is for this reason alone
that the music industry should drop their law suits against Napster
and its ilk and thank them for introducing new acts to millions
of potential new customers.
|